Harold Davis v. The Law Office of A.J. Fudge, Inc.
| Harold Davis |
| Does 1-10, inclusive, The Law Office of A.J. Fudge, Inc., Amanda Jane Fudge and Amanda Jane Fudge an individual doing business as The Law Office of A.J. Fudge |
| 2:2019cv07298 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Amanda Jane Fudge amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by plaintiff Harold Davis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Van Loben Sels, John) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Law Office of A.J. Fudge, Inc. answer now due 11/6/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant The Law Office of A.J. Fudge, Inc..(Attorney Michael Jason Kaiser added to party The Law Office of A.J. Fudge, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kaiser, Michael) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Harold Davis, upon Defendant The Law Office of A.J. Fudge, Inc. served on 9/16/2019, answer due 10/7/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bethany Fraysier - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Van Loben Sels, John) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant The Law Office of A.J. Fudge, Inc.. (yl) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Report on Filing of Copyright Action (Initial Notification) #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by plaintiff Harold Davis. (Van Loben Sels, John) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-07298 PA(RAOx). (rn)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Harold Davis. (Van Loben Sels, John) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Harold Davis, identifying None. (Van Loben Sels, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Harold Davis. (Van Loben Sels, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24309511 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Harold Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Attorney John D Van Loben Sels added to party Harold Davis(pty:pla))(Van Loben Sels, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
