Adis Hayrapetyan v. U.S. Bancorp et al
Plaintiff: Adis Hayrapetyan
Defendant: U.S. Bancorp, Does 1 through 100, inclusive and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv07329
Filed: August 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2019 Filing 12 The hearing on the MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney #11 , scheduled for October 21, 2019 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 4, 2019 Filing 11 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Jack Bazerkanian to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Plaintiff Adis Hayrapetyan. Motion set for hearing on 10/21/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Jack Bazerkanian, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Bazerkanian, H)
August 30, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #9 by U.S. Bancorp defendants. The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Proof of Service (subsequent documents). Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
August 29, 2019 Filing 9 Certificate of Service of Notice to Superior Court and Adverse Party re Defendants' Removal of Action to Federal Court and Related Documents filed by Defendants U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (Takahashi, Momo)
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 12/2/19 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
August 23, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
August 23, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh)
August 23, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, identifying Adis Hayrapetyan; U.S. Bancorp; U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC; U.S. Bank N.A. (Takahashi, Momo)
August 23, 2019 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (Takahashi, Momo)
August 23, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC. (Takahashi, Momo)
August 23, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court - Pomona Courthouse South, case number 19PSCV00237 Receipt No: 0973-24314208 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, U.S. Bancorp. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael A. Hood in support of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit A to Hood Declaration - Summons, Complaint & Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit B to Hood Declaration - Service of Process Transmittal Sheet, #4 Exhibit C to Hood Declaration - Notice of Case Assignment, #5 Exhibit D to Hood Declaration - Order to Show Cause, #6 Exhibit E to Hood Declaration - Notice of Case Management Conference, #7 Exhibit F to Hood Declaration - Answer, #8 Exhibit G to Hood Declaration - U.S. Bancorp Printout, #9 Exhibit H to Hood Declaration - U.S. Bancorp About Us webpage, #10 Exhibit I to Hood Declaration - U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC printout, #11 Exhibit J to Hood Declaration - U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC About Us webpage, #12 Exhibit K to Hood Declaration - State Bar printout for Mr. Bazerkanian, #13 Declaration of Paul Connelly in support of Notice of Removal, #14 Declaration of Natasha Knack in support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Momo Emily Takahashi added to party U.S. Bancorp(pty:dft), Attorney Momo Emily Takahashi added to party U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Takahashi, Momo)
August 23, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Adis Hayrapetyan. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/11/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, DOCUMENT 1-2 #1 ) (lh)
August 23, 2019 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendants U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC.(lh) (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, DOCUMENT 1-7 #1 )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adis Hayrapetyan v. U.S. Bancorp et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bancorp
Represented By: Michael A Hood
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
Represented By: Michael A Hood
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adis Hayrapetyan
Represented By: H Jack Bazerkanian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?