Billy Rae Shandee Maldonado v. Asucion Johnson et al
Billy Rae Shandee Maldonado |
M. Lewis, Asucion Johnson, M. Mijangeo and David C. Fathi |
2:2019cv07464 |
August 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
James V Selna |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee.. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $0.09 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (kca) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Billy Rae Shandee Maldonado. (ghap) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants David C. Fathi, Asucion Johnson, M. Lewis, M. Mijangeo pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Sherri Pym., filed by plaintiff Billy Rae Shandee Maldonado. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.