Chris Langer v. Vanlin, LLC et al
| Chris Langer |
| Does 1-10, Shadi Edward San, Eye Pod Optometry, Inc. and Vanlin, LLC |
| 2:2019cv07525 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that the this case was reassigned to Judge Percy Anderson and the initials PA should replace CAS. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo) |
Filing 20
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 12/9/2019 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendants Eye Pod Optometry, Inc., Shadi Edward San, Vanlin, LLC.(Badkoubehi, Kevin) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Eye Pod Optometry, Inc. answer now due 10/18/2019; Vanlin, LLC answer now due 10/18/2019, filed by Defendants Eye Pod Optometry, Inc.; Shadi Edward San; Vanlin, LLC.(Attorney Kevin M Badkoubehi added to party Eye Pod Optometry, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin M Badkoubehi added to party Shadi Edward San(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin M Badkoubehi added to party Vanlin, LLC(pty:dft))(Badkoubehi, Kevin) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before October 8, 2019, why defendant Vanlin, LLC, and defendant Eye Pod Optometry, Inc., should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (lom)
|
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Shadi Edward San served on 9/27/2019, answer due 10/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Caroline Mirza-Co owner in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Eye Pod Optometry, Inc. served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Steve D phung in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Vanlin, LLC served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ante Nabong Trinidad in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and one or more "construction-related accessability claims" under California law, including a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Act. Because the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and any other state law claims, and in light of California's statutory efforts to curtail such claims, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and any other state law claims asserted in the Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). The Court has reviewed the Response filed by plaintiff and plaintiffs counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FULL DETAILS). For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(4). (mrgo)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Chris Langerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Show Cause Response due by 9/16/2019. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-07525 PA(JPRx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Eye Pod Optometry, Inc., Shadi Edward San, Vanlin, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24354301 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
