Eddie D. Jones v. Alex Villanueva et al
| Eddie D. Jones |
| Deputy Merino, County of Los Angeles and Alex Villanueva |
| 2:2019cv07561 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Gail J Standish |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #2 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court, if submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. (iv)
|
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Eddie D. Jones. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by plaintiff Eddie D. Jones against Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Merino, Alex Villanueva, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
