Wilson Claude Chouest, Jr. v. Stu Sherman
Petitioner: Wilson Claude Chouest, Jr.
Respondent: Stu Sherman
Case Number: 2:2019cv07563
Filed: August 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E McDermott
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO THE ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Petitioner's "Requesting for Extension of Time" ("Request"), filed October 18, 2019. Petitioner's Request is GRANTED. Petitioner's Reply to the Answer is now due no later than November 22, 2019. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. #10 (sbou)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REQUEST for Extension of Time filed by Petitioner Wilson Claude Chouest, Jr. (sbou)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Return to Habeas Petition (2254) #8 (Attachments: #1 LODGE 1 - CT Vol 1 of 5, #2 LODGE 1 - CT Vol 2 of 5, #3 LODGE 1 - CT Vol 3 of 5, #4 LODGE 1 - CT Vol 4 of 5, #5 LODGE 1 - CT Vol 5 of 5, #6 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 1 of 13, #7 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 2 of 13, #8 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 3 of 13, #9 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 4 of 13, #10 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 5 of 13, #11 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 6 of 13, #12 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 7 of 13, #13 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 8 of 13, #14 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 9 of 13, #15 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 10 of 13, #16 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 11 of 13, #17 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 12 of 13, #18 LODGE 2 - RT_Vol 13 of 13, #19 LODGE 3 - AOB filed.pdf, #20 LODGE 4 - RB FILED.pdf, #21 LODGE 5 - Reply Brief.pdf, #22 LODGE 6 - Opinion.pdf, #23 LODGE 7 - Petition for Review, #24 LODGE 8 - Order Denying Petition)(Inberg, Kristen)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by RESPONDENT Stu Sherman.(Inberg, Kristen)
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kristen Joy Inberg counsel for Respondent Stu Sherman. Adding Kristen J. Inberg as counsel of record for Stu Sherman for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Stu Sherman, Warden. (Attorney Kristen Joy Inberg added to party Stu Sherman(pty:res))(Inberg, Kristen)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) AMENDED ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("Request") filed August 30, 2019. The Request is GRANTED. (sbou)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("Request") filed January 11, 2019. The Request is GRANTED. (sbou)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: that Respondent Stu Sherman file Answer to the Petition not later than 10/3/2019. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 10/3/2019. Traverse due by 10/31/2019 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (sbou)
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap)
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Wilson Claude Chouest, Jr. (ghap)
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Wilson Claude Chouest, Jr. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson Claude Chouest, Jr. v. Stu Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Wilson Claude Chouest, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stu Sherman
Represented By: Kristen Joy Inberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?