Christine Pisano v. Conduent Business Services, LLC et al
| Christine Pisano |
| Conduent Business Services, LLC and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv07565 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| John F Walter |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS 1-9 AND 11, AND JOINT MOTION TO STAY CLAIM 10 PENDING MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION by Judge John F. Walter. Claims 1-9 and 11 of the Complaint are voluntarily dismissed; and, Claim 10 of the Complaint is stayed pending Mediation and Arbitration,of Claims 1-9 and 11. The parties shall file a joint report regarding the status of the mediation and arbitration every 120 days, with the first status report due on February 20, 2020. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (iv)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Christine Pisano. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bitton, Ophir) |
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter.The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 7/10/2020 at 10:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 7/17/2020 at 10:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 7/28/2020 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on October 7, 2019 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: April 6, 2019. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: April 10, 2019. (iv)
|
| Filing 15 RULE 26(F) JOINT REPORT REPORT filed by Defendant Conduent Business Services, LLC. (Hearne, Heather) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RULE 26 SUBMISSIONS AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #13 by Judge John F. Walter. DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Reschedule Schedule Conference and Deadline for Joint Report filed by Defendant Conduent Business Services, LLC, Does. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Heather D Hearne added to party Does(pty:dft))(Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Heather D. Hearne Regarding Notice of Removal in Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles filed by Defendants Conduent Business Services, LLC, Does. (Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Heather D. Hearne Lead Counsel filed by Defendants Conduent Business Services, LLC, Does. (Hearne, Heather) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for October 7, 2019 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before October 2, 2019. (iv)
|
|
Filing 9
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:19-cv-07565 JFW (AFMx). (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christine Pisano, (Bitton, Ophir) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge (Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Conduent Business Services, LLC, Does 1 through 25, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Christine Pisano. Filed in State Court on 7/12/2019. Submitted with attachment 1 to notice of removal #1 (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Conduent Business Services, LLC. Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Conduent Business Services, LLC. (Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Conduent Business Services, LLC, identifying Conduent Incorporated. (Hearne, Heather) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - Central District, case number 1 9ST CV 24338 with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 08/30/2019, receipt number 26JS06VU), filed by Defendant Conduent Business Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit) (Attorney Heather D Hearne added to party Conduent Business Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Hearne, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
