Frederick Robinson v. Insurance Line One, LLC
| Frederick Robinson |
| Insurance Line One, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv07602 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| John E McDermott |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall.READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Insurance Line One, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Frederick Robinson, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Frederick Robinson. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Frederick Robinson. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24365754 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Frederick Robinson. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Frederick Robinson(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
