Cynthia Alcala v. Kevin K. McAleenan
Cynthia Alcala |
Kevin K. McAleenan |
Acting Secretary Kevin K. McAleenan |
2:2019cv07710 |
September 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kevin K. McAleenan answer now due 12/12/2019, filed by defendant Kevin K. McAleenan.(Attorney Grace Y Park added to party Kevin K. McAleenan(pty:dft))(Park, Grace) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kevin K. McAleenan. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Alcala, (Blum, Edward) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Alcala. (Blum, Edward) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Alcala. (Blum, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24388218 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Alcala. (Attorney Edward J Blum added to party Cynthia Alcala(pty:pla))(Blum, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.