Angelique D. Spurlock v. People of the State of California
| Angelique D. Spurlock and Angelique D Spurlock |
| People of the State of California |
| 2:2019cv07787 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Second APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DECLARATION OF JONATHAN M. KRAUSS; [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Respondent People of the State of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Krauss, Jonathan) |
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court liberally construes petitioner's Opening Brief as an exhibit to her Petition, and will consider the arguments presented therein to the extent those arguments support any of the four grounds for relief raised in the Petition. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT Filed to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 filed by Petitioner Angelique D Spurlock. (sbou) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S FIRST APPLICATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Respondent's Application for an Enlargement of Time to and including November 13, 2019, within which to file a Motion to Dismiss, and to and including November 27, 2019, within which to file an Answer and Return to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, is GRANTED. #5 (et)
|
| Filing 5 First APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DECLARATION OF JONATHAN M. KRAUSS; [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Respondent People of the State of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Krauss, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Deputy Attorney General Jonathan M. Krauss on behalf of Respondent People of the State of California. (Attorney Jonathan Matthew Krauss added to party People of the State of California(pty:res))(Krauss, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: that Respondent People of the State of California file Answer to the Petition not later than 10/28/2019. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 10/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (sbou)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (esa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/10/2019: #1 CV111) (esa). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams,(Filing fee due), filed by petitioner Angelique D. Spurlock. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
