Brian Whitaker v. Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC et al
Brian Whitaker |
Linda s Jewelry in L.A., Inc., Does 1-10 and Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC |
2:2019cv07847 |
September 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Linda s Jewelry in L.A., Inc., identifying None. (Sabo, Gregory) |
Filing 23 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC, identifying None. (Sabo, Gregory) |
Filing 22 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #19 by Deputy Clerk. Notice of Interested Parties to be filed no later than October 31, 2019. (gga) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #18 by Deputy Clerk. Notice of Interested Parties to be filed no later than October 31, 2019. (gga) |
Filing 20 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC #17 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Answer and/or Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Motion to Dismiss on file. (iv) |
Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 17 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC.(Attorney Gregory K Sabo added to party Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC(pty:dft))(Sabo, Gregory) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Linda s Jewelry in L.A., Inc. answer now due 11/14/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Linda s Jewelry in L.A., Inc..(Sabo, Gregory) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF INTENT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on December 19, 2019. (gga) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Linda s Jewelry in L.A., Inc..(Attorney Gregory K Sabo added to party Linda s Jewelry in L.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Sabo, Gregory) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC served on 10/4/2019, answer due 10/25/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lidia Lamonica - The front desk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 11 ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. This claim is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff to assert it in state court. The Court retains jurisdiction over Plaintiff's ADA claim. (iv) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitakerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Linda s Jewelry in L.A., Inc. served on 10/3/2019, answer due 10/24/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause as to why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim for similar reasons. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause by October 7, 2019. (iv) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Broadway and Eighth Investments, LLC, Linda s Jewelry in L.A., Inc. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24415175 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.