Soo Oh v. Devonshire and Mason Investors, LLC
| Soo Oh |
| Devonshire and Mason Investors, LLC and DOES 1-10 inclusive |
| 2:2019cv07882 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Devonshire and Mason Investors, LLC answer now due 11/14/2019, filed by defendant Devonshire and Mason Investors, LLC.(Attorney Michael Joseph Karlin added to party Devonshire and Mason Investors, LLC(pty:dft))(Karlin, Michael) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Act. Because the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and in light of California's statutory efforts to curtail such claims, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(2) & (c)(4). Despite a statement in the Court's Order to Show Cause warning plaintiff that "[f]ailure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the... Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims," (Docket No. 10), Plaintiff did not file a timely response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore dismisses that claim without prejudice. (See document for full details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore dismisses that claim without prejudice. (lom)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Soo Oh, upon Defendant Devonshire and Mason Investors, LLC served on 9/24/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Marc Magid, Registered Agent (W/ M/ 5'4"/ 170lbs/ Brw hair/55+) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, Jong) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. (Show Cause Response due by 9/27/2019.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Devonshire and Mason Investors, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Soo Oh, (Kim, Jong) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Soo Oh. (Kim, Jong) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Soo Oh. (Kim, Jong) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24422855 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Soo Oh. (Attorney Jong Yun Kim added to party Soo Oh(pty:pla))(Kim, Jong) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
