Brian Whitaker v. High Noon Office, LLC et al
Brian Whitaker |
Does 1-10, High Noon Office, LLC and The Misfit Restaurant, LLC |
2:2019cv07893 |
September 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Dolly M Gee |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker, re Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #19 served on 10/21/2019. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker, re Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) #14 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #13 served on 10/21/2019. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 21 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On October 18, 2019, the clerk entered default as to Defendant High Noon Office, LLC #20 . The Order to Show Cause dated October 16, 2019 #15 is hereby discharged. Plaintiff shall move for default judgment within 30 days after a final disposition of the pending claims against all remaining defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 20 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to High Noon Office, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (yl) |
Filing 19 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/29/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 12/13/2019 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Misfit Restaurant, LLC, (Lynn, Caroline) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Misfit Restaurant, LLC.(Attorney Caroline Ann Lynn added to party The Misfit Restaurant, LLC(pty:dft))(Lynn, Caroline) |
Filing 16 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant High Noon Office, LLC filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of service) (Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 15 MINUTES-IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. According, the Court, on its own motion, orders the plaintiff(s) to show cause in cause in writing on or before 10/30/2019 why this action should not be dismissed as to Defendant High Noon Office, LLC for lack of prosecution. (See minutes for further details) (yl) |
Filing 14 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
Filing 13 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 12 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Reassign Pursuant to General Order 19-03 filed on 10/10/2019. The case number will now read CV 19-7893-DMG (Ex). Additional information about Judge Gee's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Filing 11 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-07893 DMG(Ex). (rn) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant The Misfit Restaurant, LLC served on 10/5/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kevin Dunn - Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant High Noon Office, LLC served on 9/23/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky De George in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants High Noon Office, LLC, The Misfit Restaurant, LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24424413 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.