Clarence Gibbs v. CDCR Secretary
| Clarence Gibbs |
| CDCR Secretary |
| 2:2019cv07919 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. Related to: Order on Motion to Withdraw #6 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (et) |
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS PETITION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Motion is GRANTED. The Petition is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner is reminded that there is a one-year statute of limitations governing habeas petitions in federal court, and that this Petition does not toll the limitations period. #5 (et)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Requiring Petitioner to File Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Petitioner shall submit to the Court the filing fee of $5 or file a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis with the required supporting documentation. See order for further details. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-69, pp. 10-11)) (csi)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Withdraw Recently Filed Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Without Prjudice filed by Petitioner Clarence Gibbs. (sbou) |
| Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Clarence Gibbs. (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero.(Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Clarence Gibbs. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clarence Gibbs v. CDCR Secretary | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Clarence Gibbs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CDCR Secretary | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
