James Jancales et al v. HD Supply, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: James Jancales and Robert Vose
Defendant: HD Supply, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2019cv07924
Filed: September 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Referring Judge: Patrick J Walsh
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A Scheduling Conference has been placed on calendar for January 27, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case, including the claims being asserted. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer, as required by F.R. Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/17/2020. (sw)
September 19, 2019 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant HD Supply, Inc., re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #7 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 (Krauthamer, Danielle)
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
September 16, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
September 16, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (ghap)
September 16, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Shalem Shem-Tov counsel for Plaintiffs James Jancales, Robert Vose. Adding Shalem Shem-Tov as counsel of record for James Jancales and Robert Vose for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff James Jancales and Robert Vose. (Attorney Shalem Shem-Tov added to party James Jancales(pty:pla), Attorney Shalem Shem-Tov added to party Robert Vose (pty:pla))(Shem-Tov, Shalem)
September 12, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant HD Supply, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/11/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap)
September 12, 2019 NON CONFORM COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, HD Supply, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Robert Vose, James Jancales. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
September 12, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant HD Supply, Inc., identifying James Jancales; Robert Vose; HD Supply, Inc.; and HD Supply Management, Inc.. (Krauthamer, Danielle)
September 12, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant HD Supply, Inc.. (Krauthamer, Danielle)
September 12, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19CHCV00663 Receipt No: 0973-24428989 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant HD Supply, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Pamela Smith, #2 Declaration of Danielle S. Krauthamer, #3 Exhibit A-C ISO DSK Declaration) (Attorney Danielle Samantha Krauthamer added to party HD Supply, Inc.(pty:dft))(Krauthamer, Danielle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James Jancales et al v. HD Supply, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Jancales
Represented By: Raviv Netzah
Represented By: Nathaniel Russell Cowden
Represented By: Shalem Shem-Tov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Vose
Represented By: Raviv Netzah
Represented By: Nathaniel Russell Cowden
Represented By: Shalem Shem-Tov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HD Supply, Inc.
Represented By: Danielle Samantha Krauthamer
Represented By: Todd B Scherwin
Represented By: Sarina Saluja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?