Samuel Blanco v. H. Anglea
| Samuel Blanco |
| H. Anglea |
| 2:2019cv08093 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court directs the Attorney General to respond to the petition and supplemental statement by motion or answer. The Attorney Generals response will be due by December 6. (See Minute Order for further details) re: Statement #5 . (vm)
|
| Filing 5 STATEMENT filed by Petitioner Samuel Blanco. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2)(vm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Shira Seigle Markovich on behalf of Respondent H. Anglea. (Attorney Shira Seigle Markovich added to party H. Anglea(pty:res))(Markovich, Shira) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE: REVIEW OF HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court ORDERS Petitioner to file either: (a) a written statement (not to exceed 10 pages excluding attachments) that satisfies the criteria set forth above; or (b) a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of the action. Petitioner shall file either document with the Court by or before October 18, 2019. (See document for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (vm)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R Wilner.(Filing fee $ 5: PAID.), filed by petitioner Samuel Blanco. (Attachments: #1 Part 1 2254, #2 Part 2 2254, #3 Part 3 of 2254, #4 Part 4 of 2254, #5 Part 5 of 2254, #6 Part 6 of 2254, #7 Part 7 of 2254) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Samuel Blanco v. H. Anglea | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: H. Anglea | |
| Represented By: | Shira Seigle Markovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Samuel Blanco | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
