Billy Joe Johnson, Jr. v. Robert Neuschmid
| Billy Joe Johnson, Jr. |
| Robert Neuschmid |
| 2:2019cv08119 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Otis D Wright |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym granting #7 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is GRANTED and that Respondent is granted until December 10, 2019, to file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and until December 25, 2019, to file an Answer. (jlo)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND TO FILE AN ANSWER filed by respondent Robert Neuschmid. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Harris, Julie) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (sbou) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Julie A. Harris on behalf of respondent Robert Neuschmid. (Attorney Julie Ann Harris added to party Robert Neuschmid(pty:res))(Harris, Julie) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 CV-11B) (kca)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Granting Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Accordingly, the $5.00 filing fee is orderedWAIVED. (kca)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Billy Joe Johnson, Jr. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Billy Joe Johnson, Jr. v. Robert Neuschmid | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Robert Neuschmid | |
| Represented By: | Julie Ann Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Billy Joe Johnson, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
