Felicia Cherie Taylor v. Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson and Hornik LLC et al
felicia cherie taylor |
DOES 1 - 10, inclusive, Camryn P. Berk, RAUSCH, STURM, ISRAEL, ENERSON & HORNIK, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson and Hornik LLC |
2:2019cv08123 |
September 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A Oliver |
Otis D Wright |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 11 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-08123 ODW (RAOx). (esa) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 . Document number 7 due to clerical error. The docket clerk attached ADR-8 with wrong spelling of defendant Rausch, Strurm, Israel, Enerson and Hornik LLC to entire image of the new action. The correct spelling is Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson and Hornik LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Camryn P. Berk, Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson and Hornik LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 7 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 9/20/2019, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 9] NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) Modified on 9/20/2019 (ghap). |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff felicia cherie taylor. (Butler, Aidan) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff felicia cherie taylor. (Butler, Aidan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by plaintiff felicia cherie taylor. Related Case(s): Not applicable (Butler, Aidan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff felicia cherie taylor, identifying RAUSCH, STURM, ISRAEL, ENERSON & HORNIK, LLC, defendant, CAMRYN P. BERK, defendant; FELICIA CHERIE TAYLOR, plaintiff. (Butler, Aidan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24466730 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff felicia cherie taylor. (Attorney Aidan W Butler added to party felicia cherie taylor(pty:pla))(Butler, Aidan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.