Leemanuel Weilch v. Poke Plus LLC et al
| LEEMANUEL WEILCH |
| DOES 1 through 10, POKE PLUS LLC and TAING FAMILY TRUST |
| 2:2019cv08135 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Poke Plus LLC, Taing Family Trust. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff LEEMANUEL WEILCH, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff LEEMANUEL WEILCH. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff LEEMANUEL WEILCH. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24467537 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff LEEMANUEL WEILCH. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party LEEMANUEL WEILCH(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
