Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Cree, Inc.
Plaintiff: Document Security Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Cree, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv08141
Filed: September 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2019 Filing 20 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kristin Noel to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Cree, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24774133) filed by Defendant Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Franklin, Darren)
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #17 Non-Resident Attorney Anita M. Boor APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of defendant Cree Inc, designating Darren M. Franklin as local counsel. (mrgo)
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Matthew J. Duchemin APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of defendant Cree Inc, designating Darren M. Franklin as local counsel. (mrgo)
October 28, 2019 Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Anita M. Boor to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Cree, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24683823) filed by Defendant Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Franklin, Darren)
October 28, 2019 Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew J. Duchemin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Cree, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24683713) filed by Defendant Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Franklin, Darren)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 60 DAYS by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days), #12 . Defendant Cree, Inc's answer due 12/20/2019. (mrgo)
October 17, 2019 Filing 14 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Cree, Inc., identifying Cree, Inc.. (Franklin, Darren)
October 17, 2019 Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Cree, Inc. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Franklin, Darren)
October 17, 2019 Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to December 20, 2019 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Darren M Franklin added to party Cree, Inc.(pty:dft))(Franklin, Darren)
October 7, 2019 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc., upon Defendant Cree, Inc. served on 9/30/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Paz, CT Corporation System, Inc., Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ledahl, Brian)
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
September 23, 2019 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Cree, Inc. (jtil)
September 21, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
September 21, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil)
September 19, 2019 Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc.. (Ledahl, Brian)
September 19, 2019 Filing 5 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc., (Ledahl, Brian)
September 19, 2019 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc. (Ledahl, Brian)
September 19, 2019 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Document Security Systems, Inc.. (Ledahl, Brian)
September 19, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc.. (Ledahl, Brian)
September 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24469681 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Brian D Ledahl added to party Document Security Systems, Inc.(pty:pla))(Ledahl, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Cree, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Document Security Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Brian D Ledahl
Represented By: Neil Alan Rubin
Represented By: Jacob Robert Buczko
Represented By: Minna Y Chan
Represented By: Paul A Kroeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cree, Inc.
Represented By: Darren M Franklin
Represented By: Kristin Graham Noel
Represented By: Matthew J Duchemin
Represented By: Anita M Boor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?