Jong Ja Kim v. Bank of America, National Association et al
Plaintiff: JONG JA KIM
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10 and BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Case Number: 2:2019cv08271
Filed: September 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L Abrams
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0901
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2019 Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bank of America, National Association answer now due 12/9/2019, filed by Defendant Bank of America, National Association.(Attorney Kathy H Gao added to party Bank of America, National Association(pty:dft))(Gao, Kathy)
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTES ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore dismisses that claim without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367 (c)(4). IT IS SO ORDERED. (See minutes for further details) (yl)
October 22, 2019 Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jong Ja Kimto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #10 re Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than October 22, 2019. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the dismissal of those claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (lc)
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-08271 ODW (PLAx). (esa)
September 25, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Bank of America, National Association. (jtil)
September 25, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
September 25, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jtil)
September 24, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JONG JA KIM, (Kim, Jason)
September 24, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JONG JA KIM. (Kim, Jason)
September 24, 2019 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JONG JA KIM. (Kim, Jason)
September 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24492540 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff JONG JA KIM. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party JONG JA KIM(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jong Ja Kim v. Bank of America, National Association et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Kathy H Gao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JONG JA KIM
Represented By: Jason J Kim
Represented By: Jason T Yoon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?