Jae S. Nah v. Andrew V. Jablon et al
| Jae S. Nah, Edward J. Nah and Jae S Nah |
| Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh, Andrew Kim, Andrew V. Jablon and Michael E. Byerts |
| 2:2019cv08310 |
| September 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION: 1) FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT; 2) TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; AND 3) FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING PRE-APPROVAL OF ANY FUTURE LITIGATION BY PLAINTIFF AS TO THE SUBJECT MATTER THIS DISPUTE filed by Defendants Michael E. Byerts, Andrew V. Jablon, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Andrew V. Jablon, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Knox, Stacey) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Michael E. Byerts, Andrew V. Jablon, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh, identifying Plaintiff, Jae S. Nah (aka Edward J. Nah); Defendant Andrew V. Jablon; Defendant Michael E. Byerts; Defendant Andrew Kim; Defendant Royal Printex, Inc.; and Defendant Brian Huh. (Knox, Stacey) |
| Filing 16 JOINDER in NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendants Michael E. Byerts, Andrew V. Jablon, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh. (Attorney Stacey N Knox added to party Michael E. Byerts(pty:dft))(Knox, Stacey) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Andrew V. Jablon, Andrew Kim, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh, identifying Plaintiff, Jae S. Nah (aka Edward J. Nah); Defendant Andrew V. Jablon; Defendant Michael E. Byerts; Defendant Andrew Kim; Defendant Royal Printex, Inc.; and Defendant Brian Huh. (Knox, Stacey) |
| Filing 13 JOINDER in NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 Defendant Andrew V. Jablon's Joinder in Defendants' Motion: 1) For More Definite Statement; 2) To Dismiss for Lack of Subjection Matter Jurisdiction and; 3) For An Order Requiring Pre-Approval of Any Future LItigation By Plaintiff As To The Subject Matter Of This Dispute filed by Defendant Andrew V. Jablon. (Attorney Stacey N Knox added to party Andrew V. Jablon(pty:dft))(Knox, Stacey) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Dismiss Case #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Compliance with Local Rule 7.1-1 is required no later than 11/11/2019. Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 15 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND REQUEST OF EX-PARTE BY DEFENDANTS FOR CONFLICT OF INTERESTS BETWEEN ATTORNEYS, DEFENDANTS AND FOR MISLEADING JUDICIAL PROCESS re: Motion to Dismiss #9 filed by Plaintiff Jae S. Nah. (iv) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 1/9/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (cw)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendants Andrew Kim, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Knox, Stacey) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Andrew Kim, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh. Motion set for hearing on 12/5/2019 (erroneously filed as 11/8/2019) at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrew V. Jablon, #2 Exhibit A) (Attorney Stacey N Knox added to party Andrew Kim(pty:dft), Attorney Stacey N Knox added to party Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh(pty:dft)) (Knox, Stacey) Modified on 10/28/2019 (cw). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh. correcting Notice of Related Case(s) #7 NOTICE OF ERRATA AS TO CM/ECF OPTION WHEN FILING DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF RELATED CASES ON OCTOBER 8, 2019 [DKT. 7] (Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Andrew Kim, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-03767-VAP-JCX (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Jablon, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jae S. Nah. (lh) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Michael E. Byerts, Andrew V. Jablon, Andrew Kim, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Michael E. Byerts, Andrew V. Jablon, Andrew Kim, Royal Printex Inc. and Brian Huh.Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon.(Filing Fee $ 400 Paid) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jae S. Nah. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
