Mister Bailey v. Geyser Peak Investment Inc. et al
MISTER BAILEY |
DOES 1 through 10, CENTRAL MATRIX, LLC, GEYSER PEAK INVESTMENT INC. and Geyser Peak Investment Inc. doing business as SAGE BISTRO |
2:2019cv08472 |
October 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Central Matrix, LLC answer now due 12/6/2019; Geyser Peak Investment Inc. answer now due 12/6/2019, filed by Attorney for Defendant Central Matrix, LLC; Geyser Peak Investment Inc..(Attorney Michael Allen Correia added to party Central Matrix, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Allen Correia added to party Geyser Peak Investment Inc.(pty:dft))(Correia, Michael) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercisesupplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim and any other construction-relatedaccessibility state law claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claim without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(4). IT IS SO ORDERED. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (yl) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Mister Baileyto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #10 re Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than October 22, 2019. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the dismissal of those claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (lc) |
Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents (lc) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Central Matrix, LLC, and Geyser Peak Investment Inc. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff MISTER BAILEY, (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MISTER BAILEY. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff MISTER BAILEY. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24535019 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff MISTER BAILEY. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party MISTER BAILEY(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.