Great American Insurance Company v. APL Co. Pte Ltd et al
Great American Insurance Company |
Does One through Ten, APL Co. Pte Ltd and APL Limited |
2:2019cv08500 |
October 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
John D Early |
Contract: Marine |
49 U.S.C. § 81 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled. The parties have ten (10) days from the date of this order or until the next scheduled court appearance, whichever is shorter, to file with the court a dismissal of the action or to appear, in-person or telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. The Court has also reviewed plaintiff's Response to the Court's November 18,2019 Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff's Response is inconsistent with the Proof ofService plaintiff filed on October 17, 2019 (Docket No. 10). The Court therefore concludes that plaintiff has not satisfactorily responded to the Order to Show Cause. Unless the parties place the settlement on the record or this action is dismissed, plaintiff shall file a further Response to the Order to Show Cause by no later than December 23, 2019. (mrgo) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Companyto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #18 Response to Order to Show Cause (Kirsch, Joshua) |
Filing 18 MINUTES Of Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 11/25/2019 why Defendant APL Co. Pte Ltd. should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Filing 17 ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #16 by Judge Percy. The parties Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference is denied as moot. In the interim the parties are certainly not precluded from conducting meaningful settlement negotiations. IT IS SO ORDERED. Anderson (yl) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from December 30, 2019 to January 27, 2020 Re: Order, Set/Reset Hearing #15 filed by Defendant FENIX MARINE SERVICES, LTD., erroneously sued and served as APL Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vick, Jonathan) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 12/30/2019 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo) |
Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant APL Limited identifying FIN TopCo Partnership, LP as Corporate Parent. (Vick, Jonathan) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FENIX MARINE SERVICES, LTD., erroneously sued and served as APL Limited, (Vick, Jonathan) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by FENIX MARINE SERVICES, LTD., erroneously sued and served as Defendant APL LIMITED APL Limited.(Attorney Jonathan S Vick added to party APL Limited(pty:dft))(Vick, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company, upon Defendant APL Limited served on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky DeGeorge - CSC - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company, upon Defendant APL Co. Pte Ltd served on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky DeGeorge - CSC - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants APL Co. Pte Ltd, APL Limited. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
Filing 5 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company, identifying ABM International Ltd.. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company identifying American Financial Group as Corporate Parent. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24539307 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company. (Attorney Joshua E Kirsch added to party Great American Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Kirsch, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.