Colton Bryant v. Gyu Kwang Jung, et al
COLTON BRYANT |
PAKS WESTERN PLAZA, LLC, DOES 1 to 10,, GYU KWANG JUNG, Does 1 to 10 and Gyu Kwang Jung doing business as Have Some Coffee |
2:2019cv08537 |
October 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Colton Bryant. (Kim, Jason) |
![]() |
Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
![]() |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Gyu Kwang Jung, Paks Western Plaza, LLC. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff COLTON BRYANT, (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff COLTON BRYANT. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff COLTON BRYANT. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24548621 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff COLTON BRYANT. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party COLTON BRYANT(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.