Intex Recreation Corp. v. Bestway USA, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Intex Recreation Corp.
Defendant: Bestway (USA), Inc., Bestway (Hong Kong) International, Ltd., Bestway Global Holding, Inc., Bestway Hong Kong International, Ltd., Bestway Inflatables and Materials Corporation and Bestway USA, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv08596
Filed: October 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2019 Filing 20 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Intex Recreation Corp.. (Carter, R)
November 26, 2019 Filing 19 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Bestway Inflatables and Materials Corporation, Bestway USA, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #5 , filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Carter, R)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney David R. Merritt APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Intex Recreation Corp, designating Michael Jaeger as local counsel. (yl)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: granting #12 Non-Resident Attorney Louis T. Perry APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Intex Recreation Corp, designating Michael Jaeger as local counsel. (yl)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: granting #11 Non-Resident Attorney R. Trevor Carter APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Intex Recreation Corp, designating Michael Jaeger as local counsel. (yl)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-08596 AB(ASx). (rn)
October 14, 2019 Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David R. Merritt to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24601107) filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jaeger, Michael)
October 8, 2019 Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Louis T. Perry to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24575746) filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jaeger, Michael)
October 8, 2019 Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney R. Trevor Carter to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24575561) filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jaeger, Michael)
October 8, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Louis T Perry. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
October 8, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney R. Trevor Carter. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
October 8, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney David R Merritt. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
October 8, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
October 8, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car)
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 10/04/2019, receipt number 0973-24560379), filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-4)(Jaeger, Michael)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Errata Re: Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp.'s Complaint filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp.. (Jaeger, Michael)
October 4, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp., identifying Bestway (USA), Inc., Bestway Global Holding, Inc., Bestway (Hong Kong) International, Ltd., Bestway Inflatables & Materials Corp., Intex Recreation Corp., Intex Corp., Intex Marketing Ltd., Intex Development Company Ltd.. (Jaeger, Michael)
October 4, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp.. (Jaeger, Michael)
October 4, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24560379 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-4) (Attorney Michael Jaeger added to party Intex Recreation Corp.(pty:pla))(Jaeger, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Intex Recreation Corp. v. Bestway USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bestway (USA), Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bestway (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bestway Global Holding, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bestway Hong Kong International, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bestway Inflatables and Materials Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bestway USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Intex Recreation Corp.
Represented By: Michael Jaeger
Represented By: Louis T Perry
Represented By: R Trevor Carter
Represented By: David R Merritt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?