Diane Barnes v. Ford Motor Company
| Diane Barnes |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2019cv08610 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Diane Barnes.(Barry, David) |
| Filing 9 Letter to Counsel regarding MDL Transfer-In. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (car) |
| Filing 7 Copy of Conditional Transfer Order - CTO-31 received from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Transfer order filed by MDL panel on 10/4/19 regarding transfer of Case No. 2:19-cv-01890-MCE-DB from U.S. District Court Eastern District of California Live System (Sacramento). Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for the purpose of pretrial proceedings. Case consolidated with 2:18-ml-2814-AB-FFMx. (car) |
| Filing 6 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Eastern |
| Filing 5 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. Electronic Transfer Sent. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) [Transferred from California Eastern on 10/7/2019.] |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #3 Civil New Case Documents for MCE. (Harlow, Charles) [Transferred from California Eastern on 10/7/2019.] |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) [Transferred from California Eastern on 10/7/2019.] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of RELATED CASE MDL No. 2814 by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Harlow, Charles) [Transferred from California Eastern on 10/7/2019.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, Stanislaus County, case number CV-19-005357 by Diane Barnes. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8468669) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Declaration of Counsel , #6 Notice of Interested Parties)(Harlow, Charles) [Transferred from California Eastern on 10/7/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diane Barnes v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Stephen H Dye |
| Represented By: | Charles Frederick Harlow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diane Barnes | |
| Represented By: | David N Barry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
