Haitham Saeed v. Scott Wilkinson et al
| Haitham Saeed |
| Scott Beardsley, Loren McFarland, Scott Wilkinson, R. Scott Greer, Heath Lukatch, Raymond Huggenberger, Heather Rider, Alison Bauerlein, Inogen, Inc. and Benjamin Anderson-Ray |
| 2:2019cv08634 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Benjamin Anderson-Ray, Alison Bauerlein, Scott Beardsley, R. Scott Greer, Raymond Huggenberger, Inogen, Inc., Heath Lukatch, Loren McFarland, Heather Rider, Scott Wilkinson. (iv) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Haitham Saeed. (Rosen, Laurence) |
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-01643 FMO(AGRx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-08634 FMO(AGRx). Signed by Judge Fernando M. Olguin (rn)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: Please put for the Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Haitham Saeed. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-05568 (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Haitham Saeed, (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Haitham Saeed. (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Haitham Saeed. (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24569635 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Haitham Saeed. (Attorney Laurence M Rosen added to party Haitham Saeed(pty:pla))(Rosen, Laurence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
