Jenna Noble v. Dorcy Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jenna Noble
Defendant: Dorcy Pruter, Dorcy Inc., a California corporation dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute, Does 1-100, inclusive, Dorcy Inc and Dorcy Inc a California corporation doing business as Conscious Co-Parenting Institute
Counter Defendant: Monique Mason
Case Number: 2:2019cv08646
Filed: October 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTES OF (IN COURT): Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena held before Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Case is called. Counsel make their appearances. Court addresses parties. Argument heard. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to quash Defendants' subpoena. The parties are ordered to lodge a proposed stipulated protective order by no later than January 7, 2020. Court Recorder: CS 12/05/19. (sbou)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION to Quash Subpoena for Business Records to Paypal Holdings, Inc. #13 (Supplemental Memorandum) filed by Defendants Dorcy Inc, Dorcy Pruter. (Abbott, Kevin)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 The hearing on the MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #10 , scheduled for November 25, 2019 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 REPLY to Plaintiff's Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support #10 filed by Defendants Dorcy Inc, Dorcy Pruter. (Abbott, Kevin)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Quash Subpoena for Business Records to Paypal Holdings, Inc. #13 filed by Counter Defendant Jenna Noble, Plaintiff Jenna Noble. (Nomanim, Daniel)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Scheduling Conference set for March 2, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. (lom)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim #11 filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Jenna Noble.(Nomanim, Daniel)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support #10 filed by Counter Defendant Jenna Noble, Plaintiff Jenna Noble. (Nomanim, Daniel)
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER on Plaintiff's Motion and Motion to Permit Delayed Joint Stipulation Pursuant to Local Rule 37-2.1 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: granting #13 . Plaintiff's motion to permit Plaintiff to file a Joint Stipulation Pursuant to Local Rule 37-2.1 no later than November 7, 2019 is GRANTED. (sbou)
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Quash Subpoena for Business Records to Paypal Holdings, Inc. filed by Plaintiff and Cross Defendant Jenna Noble. Motion set for hearing on 12/5/2019 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Re MTQ, #2 Supplement Request for Delayed Filing of Joint Stip, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order Re Request for Delayed Filing of Joint Stip)(Nomanim, Daniel)
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jenna Noble, identifying Plaintiff and Defendants. (Nomanim, Daniel)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against Jenna Noble, Monique Mason filed by Defendants Dorcy Pruter, Dorcy Inc.(Abbott, Kevin)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Defendants Dorcy Inc, Dorcy Pruter. Motion set for hearing on 11/25/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Complaint) (Abbott, Kevin)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED, the Scheduling Conference set for January 27, 2020 is hereby VACATED. The order was issued prematurely. When an answer is filed on the docket, the Court will set a new scheduling order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 1/13/2020 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents (lc)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Jenna Noble, upon Defendant Dorcy Inc served on 8/25/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dorce Pruter agent for service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. Filed in State Court on 9/6/19 Submitted with Exhibit B attachment 2 to notice of removal #1 (car)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, inclusive, Dorcy Inc, Dorcy Pruter. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jenna Noble. Filed in State Court on 8/14/2019 Submitted with attachment 1 to notice of removal #1 (car)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Jenna Noble, upon Defendant Dorcy Pruter served on 8/25/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dorcy Pruter in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. Filed in State Court on 9/6/19 Submitted with Exhibit C attachment 3 to notice of removal #1 (car)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING WITH STATE COURT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) filed by Defendants Dorcy Inc., a California corporation dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute, Dorcy Pruter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Notice to Adverse Party of Filing of Removal))(Abbott, Kevin)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Dorcy Inc., a California corporation dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute, Dorcy Pruter, identifying Dorcy Inc. dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute; Dorcy Pruter; Jenna Noble. (Attorney Kevin James Abbott added to party Dorcy Pruter(pty:dft))(Abbott, Kevin)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Dorcy Inc., a California corporation dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute, Dorcy Pruter. (Abbott, Kevin)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19STCV28952 Receipt No: 0973-24571894 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Dorcy Inc., a California corporation dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (State Court Summons, Complaint, etc.), #2 Exhibit B (Proof of Service on Dorcy Inc.), #3 Exhibit C (Proof of Service on Dorcy Pruter)) (Attorney Kevin James Abbott added to party Dorcy Inc., a California corporation dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute(pty:dft))(Abbott, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenna Noble v. Dorcy Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dorcy Pruter
Represented By: Kevin James Abbott
Represented By: Chandra L Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dorcy Inc., a California corporation dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute
Represented By: Kevin James Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dorcy Inc
Represented By: Kevin James Abbott
Represented By: Chandra L Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dorcy Inc a California corporation doing business as Conscious Co-Parenting Institute
Represented By: Kevin James Abbott
Represented By: Chandra L Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jenna Noble
Represented By: Michael B Eisenberg
Represented By: Daniel Nomanim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Monique Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?