A.R. Thomson Group v. Harbor Seal Incorporated et al
| A.R. Thomson Group |
| Karen Edmon, Does 1 to 50, inclusive, Harbor Seal Incorporated, Steve Edmon and Kunibert Gerhardt |
| 2:2019cv08717 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause re: Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: As such, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than January 6, 2020 why the Court should not dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond by this date will result in this case being dismissed. (bm)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #14 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: IT IS ORDERED 1. Defendants' deadline to respond to the complaint in this matter shall be November 28, 2019. (bm)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Karen Edmon answer now due 11/14/2019; Steve Edmon answer now due 11/14/2019; Kunibert Gerhardt answer now due 11/14/2019; Harbor Seal Incorporated answer now due 11/14/2019,, STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 11/28/2019 filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hyam, Stephen) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group, served on Steve Edmon. (Hyam, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group, served on Karen Edmon. (Hyam, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group, Harbor Seal served on October 21, 2019. (Hyam, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group, served on October 21, 2019. (Hyam, Stephen) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 8 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group. (Hyam, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Karen Edmon, Steve Edmon, Kunibert Gerhardt, Harbor Seal Incorporated. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group, identifying A.R. Thomson Group, Harbor Seal Incorporated, Karen Edmon, Steve Edmon and Kunibert Gerhardt. (Hyam, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group. (Hyam, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24587470 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff A.R. Thomson Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Stephen Eric Hyam added to party A.R. Thomson Group(pty:pla))(Hyam, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
