June H. Shinn v. Johnson and Johnson et al
June H. Shinn |
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., f/k/a Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson and Johnson and Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. |
2:2019cv08826 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Otis D Wright |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Conditional Transfer Order - from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2738 (CTO-182), transferring case to USDC New Jersey and assigned to Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) |
|
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff June H. Shinn, (Williams, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff June H. Shinn. (Williams, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24602875 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff June H. Shinn. (Attorney Michael J Williams added to party June H. Shinn(pty:pla))(Williams, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.