Filip Mietka v. Indochino Apparel US Inc.
| Filip Mietka |
| Indochino Apparel (US) Inc. |
| 2:2019cv08862 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO JANUARY 27, 2020 #15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 15 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 27, 2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Defendant Indochino Apparel (US) Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Webb, Tammy) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Indochino Apparel (US) Inc. answer now due 12/12/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Defendant Indochino Apparel (US) Inc..(Attorney Tammy B Webb added to party Indochino Apparel (US) Inc.(pty:dft))(Webb, Tammy) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew T. Heldut to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Filip Mietka and designating Donald S. Burns as local counsel #12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew T. Heldut to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Filip Mietka (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24646050) filed by Plaintiff Filip Mietka. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Burris, Donald) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 as to defendant Indochino Apparel (US) Inc. (lc) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Filip Mietka. (Burris, Donald) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #7 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. The date and signature line must be left blank. Missing official Judge and Magistrate initial on case number, should read as 2:19-cv-08862-ODW-GJS. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Filip Mietka. (Burris, Donald) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Andrew T. Heldut. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Filip Mietka, (Burris, Donald) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24612402 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Filip Mietka. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Donald S Burris added to party Filip Mietka(pty:pla))(Burris, Donald) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. cc: don@bslaw.net (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Filip Mietka v. Indochino Apparel US Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Filip Mietka | |
| Represented By: | Andrzej Tarnasiewicz-Heldut |
| Represented By: | Donald S Burris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Indochino Apparel (US) Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Tammy B Webb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
