Carol Riegert v. Central Billing, LLC
| Carol Riegert |
| Central Billing, LLC dba Pacific Collection Group, Central Billing, LLC and Central Billing, LLC doing business as Pacific Collection Group |
| 2:2019cv08959 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| John E McDermott |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Carol Riegert.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Scheduling Grid)(Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/14/2020. (ake)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Central Billing, LLC, (Tokar, Paul) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Central Billing, LLC.(Attorney Paul Tokar added to party Central Billing, LLC (pty:dft))(Tokar, Paul) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carol Riegert, upon Defendant Central Billing, LLC served on 10/24/2019, answer due 11/14/2019. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-08959 JAK(JEMx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Central Billing, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carol Riegert, identifying None. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carol Riegert. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carol Riegert. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24623460 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Carol Riegert. (Attorney Nicholas J Bontrager added to party Carol Riegert(pty:pla))(Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
