Rosalba C. Lartundo et al v. Andrew M. Saul
Rosalba C. Lartundo and Jasmine M. Solorzano |
Andrew M. Saul |
2:2019cv08971 |
October 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Valerie Baker Fairbank |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42:405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): SUBSTITUTING DEFENDANT by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is substituted as the proper defendant in this action. (hr) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Jasmine M. Solorzano. (et) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Rosalba C. Lartundo. (et) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rosalba C. Lartundo. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY filed against Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. Case assigned to Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani., filed by Plaintiffs Rosalba C. Lartundo, Jasmine M. Solorzano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.