Orland Sylve v. ABP Hotel, LLC et al
| Orland Sylve |
| Does 1-10 and ABP Hotel, LLC |
| 2:2019cv08980 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Amended NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant ABP Hotel, LLC, identifying Orland Sylve, Plaintiff and ABP Hotel, LLC Defendant. (Daugherty, Melissa) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant ABP Hotel, LLC, identifying Orland Sylve, Plaintiff and ABP Hotel, LLC Defendant. (Daugherty, Melissa) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant ABP Hotel, LLC.(Daugherty, Melissa) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order DECLINING to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claim by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claim. The Court therefore DISMISSES that claim without prejudice. (bm)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to ABP Hotel, LLC answer now due 12/13/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant ABP Hotel, LLC.(Attorney Melissa T Daugherty added to party ABP Hotel, LLC(pty:dft))(Daugherty, Melissa) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Orland Sylveto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orland Sylve, upon Defendant ABP Hotel, LLC served on 10/24/2019, answer due 11/14/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Matthew Rips in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause re: Supplemental Jurisdiction by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than November 15, 2019 why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant ABP Hotel, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orland Sylve. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Orland Sylve, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orland Sylve. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24627247 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orland Sylve. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orland Sylve(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
