Gracie Harris v. Phyllis Easter et al
GRACIE HARRIS |
PHYLLIS EASTER, DOES 1 TO 30, inclusive and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE |
2:2019cv08991 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:19-cv-02018 JLS (SHKx). (jtil) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants PHYLLIS EASTER, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 POS)(Chen, Margaret) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVDS1924721 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Defendant UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, PHYLLIS EASTER. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Coversheet, #3 Summons, #4 Certificate of Assignment, #5 Notice of Trial Setting Conference, #6 Proof of Service of Summons., #7 Certification of Scope of Federal Employment, #8 POS) (Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party PHYLLIS EASTER(pty:dft), Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE(pty:dft))(Chen, Margaret) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.