Minh Nguyen Duy v. Donna Campagnolo et al
Minh Nguyen Duy |
Kevin K McAleenan, acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II and Donna P Campagnolo |
Kevin McAleenan and Donna Campagnolo |
2:2019cv09005 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Frederick F Mumm |
Otis D Wright |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-09005 ODW(FFMx). (rn) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying Cong Hoang. (Emerick, Scott) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Donna Campagnolo, Kevin McAleenan. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #3 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): The incorrect event was selected in the e-filing of the Civil Cover Sheet. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. No further action is required for the Civil Cover Sheet unless the Court so directs. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (car) |
Filing 3 [CIVIL COVER SHEET] FILED AS PETITION with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 10/18/2019, receipt number 26KV3LD0), filed by plaintiff Minh Nguyen Duy.(Emerick, Scott) Modified on 10/21/2019 (car). |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Minh Nguyen Duy. (Emerick, Scott) |
Filing 1 PETITION for writ of mandamus Receipt No: 0973-24632604 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Minh Nguyen Duy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Scott A Emerick added to party Minh Nguyen Duy(pty:pla))(Emerick, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.