Lebohang Morake v. Robert S Oberstein
| Lebohang Morake |
| Oberstein Wealth Management, Inc., Robert S Oberstein and RSO Advisors LLP |
| 2:2019cv09019 |
| October 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Robert S Oberstein, Oberstein Wealth Management, Inc., RSO Advisors LLP. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lebohang Morake. (Younge, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lebohang Morake, identifying Robert S Oberstein; RSO Advisors, LLP, Oberstein Wealth Management, Inc.. (Younge, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lebohang Morake. (Younge, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24635616 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Lebohang Morake. (Attorney Michael A Younge added to party Lebohang Morake(pty:pla))(Younge, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
