Daniel S. Luna v. Avalos et al
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Luna
Defendant: Amuera, Mack, Sgt Lyle, Esthadz, Arelanol, Garcia, Dr. Swibg, Faulkner, Rose, Arelamo, Deputy Estrada, Mr Cho, Avalos and Rolban
Case Number: 2:2019cv09061
Filed: October 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2019 Filing 12 Notice of Deficiency. On 12/16/2019, the Court received, through the United States Mail, the attached document for filing in the above-captioned case, which alleges claims arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. To submit a document for filing in this case, you must present it to designated staff at your facility for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your document(s) a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. Submission of this document by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02, it is hereby ORDERED that the document(s) be rejected. You must now re-submit your document(s) to the Court electronically, in accordance to General Order 18-02 and your institution's policies. If you fail to do so, the document(s) will not be filed and will not be considered by the court. (hr)
December 16, 2019 Filing 11 Notice of Deficiency. On 12/13/2019, the Court received, through the United States Mail, the attached document for filing in the above-captioned case, which alleges claims arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. To submit a document for filing in this case, you must present it to designated staff at your facility for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your document(s) a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. Submission of this document by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02, it is hereby ORDERED that the document(s) be rejected. You must now re-submit your document(s) to the Court electronically, in accordance to General Order 18-02 and your institution's policies. If you fail to do so, the document(s) will not be filed and will not be considered by the court. (hr)
December 12, 2019 Filing 10 Notice of Deficiency. On 12/11/2019, the Court received, through the United States Mail, the attached document for filing in the above-captioned case, which alleges claims arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. To submit a document for filing in this case, you must present it to designated staff at your facility for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your document(s) a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. Submission of this document by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02, it is hereby ORDERED that the document(s) be rejected. You must now re-submit your document(s) to the Court electronically, in accordance to General Order 18-02 and your institution's policies. If you fail to do so, the document(s) will not be filed and will not be considered by the court. (hr)
December 12, 2019 Filing 9 Notice of Deficiency. On 12/9/2019, the Court received, through the United States Mail, the attached document for filing in the above-captioned case, which alleges claims arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. To submit a document for filing in this case, you must present it to designated staff at your facility for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your document(s) a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. Submission of this document by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02, it is hereby ORDERED that the document(s) be rejected. You must now re-submit your document(s) to the Court electronically, in accordance to General Order 18-02 and your institution's policies. If you fail to do so, the document(s) will not be filed and will not be considered by the court. (hr)
December 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SUA SPONTE EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Plaintiff must submit his filings to designated prison staff for scanning and emailing to the Court. The Court sua sponte extends the time for Plaintiff to amend his complaint. Plaintiff must submit his First Amended Complaint and IFP Request to prison staff for scanning and emailing to the Court by January 9, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Request to Proceed, #2 Complaint Form, #3 Instructions) (dml)
November 25, 2019 Filing 7 Notice of Deficiency. On 11/20/2019, the Court received, through the United States Mail, the attached document for filing in the above-captioned case, which alleges claims arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. To submit a document for filing in this case, you must present it to designated staff at your facility for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your document(s) a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. Submission of this document by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02, it is hereby ORDERED that the document(s) be rejected. You must now re-submit your document(s) to the Court electronically, in accordance to General Order 18-02 and your institution's policies. If you fail to do so, the document(s) will not be filed and will not be considered by the court. (hr)
October 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING GEES by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court, if submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. (iv)
October 25, 2019 PROPOSED ORDER Denying IFP #2 with leave to amend within 30 days forwarded to District Judge Carney. (afe)
October 23, 2019 Filing 4 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern
October 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et)
October 18, 2019 Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Western Division*.*350 W 1st Street, Suite 4311**Los Angeles, CA 90012-4565*. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 10/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tcf) (sjt). [Transferred from California Southern on 10/23/2019.]
October 7, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel S. Luna. (jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 10/23/2019.] Modified on 10/23/2019 (et).
October 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amuera, Arelamo, Arelanol, Avalos, Cho, Esthadz, Estrada, Faulkner(Correctional Officer), Garcia, Lyle, Mack, Rolban, Rose, Swibg, filed by Daniel S. Luna.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1946-JAH-BGS. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (sjt). [Transferred from California Southern on 10/23/2019.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel S. Luna v. Avalos et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amuera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt Lyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Esthadz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arelanol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Swibg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Faulkner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arelamo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Estrada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr Cho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Avalos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rolban
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Luna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?