The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp v. McKell Kane
| The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp |
| McKell Kane and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2019cv09149 |
| October 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, having been advised by the Plaintiff that this action has been resolved by a Notice of Dismissal #14 , hereby orders this action dismissed with prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp. Dismissal is Prejudice. (Mulcahy, James) |
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to McKell Kane answer now due 12/26/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp.(Mulcahy, James) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-09149 CJC(AFMx). (rn)
|
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant McKell Kane. (yl) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp. (Mulcahy, James) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Docket No. 7 was inadvertently issued and docketed. Summons in not directed to the Defendant on record, please disregard Docket Entry No. 7 Re: Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #7 (lh) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant McKell Kane. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp, (Mulcahy, James) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp. (Mulcahy, James) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp. (Mulcahy, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24662134 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B to Complaint) (Attorney James M Mulcahy added to party The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp(pty:pla))(Mulcahy, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
