Martha Pedroza v. United States of America et al
Pedroza Martha and Martha Pedroza |
Enri Reyes De Rosas, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Postal Service and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2019cv09166 |
October 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Kenly Kiya Kato. New Case Number 5:19-cv-02056-CJC (KKx). (et) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 10/24/2019, receipt number 26L2NL97), filed by Plaintiff Pedroza Martha. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ibarra, Steven) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintif Pedroza Martha. (Ibarra, Steven) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24664556 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Pedroza Martha. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Steven Ibarra added to party Pedroza Martha(pty:pla))(Ibarra, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.