Pocholo Capati Fuerte v. J. Stuck et al
| Pocholo Capati Fuerte |
| S. Wilchite, J. Gastelo and J. Stuck |
| 2:2019cv09169 |
| October 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| John E McDermott |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt, DENYING #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, this case is DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (es)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(ch) Modified on 10/30/2019 (san). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CDCR INMATE STATEMENT REPORT, filed by Plaintiff Pocholo Capati Fuerte. (lh) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants J. Gastelo, J. Stuck, S. Wilchite pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Filed by Plaintiff Pocholo Capati Fuerte. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
