Martin Watson v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
Martin Watson |
Maui Jim, Inc. Long Term Disablity Insurance Plan and The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
2:2019cv09217 |
October 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Virginia A Phillips |
Gail J Standish |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT MAUI JIM, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, re Stipulation to Dismiss Party #14 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant MAUI JIM, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN (the "Plan") be dismissed from this action without prejudice, with the parties to bear their own attorneys fees and costs directly related to the instant Stipulation to Dismiss the Plan and the dismissal of the Plan. The Prudential Insurance Company of America shall remain the only named defendant in this action. (bm) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Maui Jim, Inc. Long Term Disablity Insurance Plan filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ellis, Patricia) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, identifying The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential"), Prudential Financial, Inc., Maui Jim, Inc. Long Term Disability Insurance Plan. (Ellis, Patricia) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America answer now due 12/26/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(Attorney Patricia A Ellis added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(Ellis, Patricia) |
Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Martin Watson, upon Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America served on 11/5/2019, answer due 11/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro of CT Corporation System Registered Agent for Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Maui Jim, Inc. Long Term Disablity Insurance Plan. (esa) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Martin Watson. (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Martin Watson. (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Martin Watson. (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 2 Certification & NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Martin Watson, (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24676243 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Martin Watson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint) (Attorney Susan B Grabarsky added to party Martin Watson(pty:pla))(Grabarsky, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.