Luis Meza v. Ford Motor Company et al
Luis Meza |
Ford Motor Company, DWWVF, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and DWWVF, Inc. a California corporation doing business as David Wilson s Villa Ford |
2:2019cv09248 |
October 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Frederick F Mumm |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Luis Meza.(Kirnos, Radomir) |
Filing 14 ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #13 , Defendant shall pay the sum of $5,491.01 to Plaintiff and Plaintiff hereby agrees to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for attorney's fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action. Defendant shall pay the sum of $5,491.01 to Plaintiff within 60 days of execution of this Stipulation by all counsel unless matters outside of the control of Defendant cause delay. The parties are ORDERED to file a Stipulation of Dismissal within ten days of the issuance of this Order. (gk) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION for Attorney Fees in the amount of $5,491.01 filed by Plaintiff Luis Meza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation regarding Plaintiff's Attorney's Fees, Costs and Expenses)(Kirnos, Radomir) |
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Radomir Roger Kirnos counsel for Plaintiff Luis Meza. Adding Roger Kirnos as counsel of record for Luis Meza for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Luis Meza. (Attorney Radomir Roger Kirnos added to party Luis Meza(pty:pla))(Kirnos, Radomir) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr: granting #10 Request to Substitute Attorney. Amir Nassihi is substituted in place of attorney Sarah G. Odegaard and Warren E Platt for Defendant DWWVF, Inc., Ford Motor Company. Attorney Sarah G Odegaard and Warren E Platt terminated. (mrgo) |
Filing 10 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Amir Nassihi in place of attorney Sarah G. Odegaard filed by Defendant DWWVF, Inc., Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Amir M Nassihi added to party DWWVF, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Amir M Nassihi added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft)) (Nassihi, Amir) |
Filing 9 MINUTES OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE held before Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. Plaintiff and Defendant reached a settlement. On June 16, 2021, the key terms of the settlement were placed on the record and the Court hereby orders the record sealed. The Court directs the parties to file a notice of settlement. The parties are to finalize the settlement and once the issues of vehicle transfer, release, costs and fees are resolved, the parties are to file a request for dismissal. This shall be completed within 90 days from the date of this order. (see document for further details) Court Recorder: Zoom. (hr) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the Case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott and Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-09248 AB (FFMx). (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (filed in state court 2/21/2019, submitted as document 1, attachment 3)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants DWWVF, Inc., Does, Ford Motor Company, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Luis Meza. (filed in state court 1/17/2019, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p.3) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant DWWVF, Inc. (filed in state court 3/4/2019, submitted as document 1, attachment 4)(esa) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Odegaard, Sarah) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order, #2 Exhibit B - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Conditional Transfer Orders, #4 Exhibit D - Proof of Service)(Odegaard, Sarah) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation, Evercore Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group. (Odegaard, Sarah) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Odegaard, Sarah) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV01438 Receipt No: 0973-24681501 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Peremptory Challenge and Order, #3 Exhibit C - Ford's Answer, #4 Exhibit D - DWWVF Inc.'s Answer, #5 Exhibit E - Plaintiff and Defendant's Case Management Statements, #6 Exhibit F - Plaintiff and Defendants Notice of Posting Jury Fees, #7 Exhibit G - Request for Dismissal, #8 Exhibit H - Declaration of Sarah Odegaard, #9 Exhibit I - Declaration of Spencer Hugret, #10 Exhibit J - Form 10-K) (Attorney Sarah G Odegaard added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Odegaard, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.