Salvador Duenas v. Ralph Diaz
| Salvador Duenas |
| Ralph M Diaz |
| 2:2019cv09271 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO COURT'S NOVEMBER 6, 2019 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE #6 by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. Petitioner shall file his Response to this Court's November 6, 2019 Order to Show Cause on or before January 6, 2020. (hr)
|
| Filing 6 First APPLICATION to Extend Time to file 28:2254 petition to 1/6/2020 Response to Court's Order to Show Cause filed by Petitioner Salvador Duenas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Bruce Zucker, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Proof Service) (Zucker, Bruce) |
|
Filing 5
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by December 6, 2019 why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to state a cognizable federal habeas claim and as barred by procedural default. (kh)
|
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Salvador Duenas. (Zucker, Bruce) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Receipt No. 0973-24684918 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Salvador Duenas. (Attorney Bruce Alan Zucker added to party Salvador Duenas(pty:bkmov))(Zucker, Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Salvador Duenas v. Ralph Diaz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ralph M Diaz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Salvador Duenas | |
| Represented By: | Bruce Alan Zucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
