GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund et al v. Avsec Printing, Inc.
Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund and GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund |
Avsec Printing, Inc. |
2:2019cv09322 |
October 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Virginia A Phillips |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kerry Kessler Fennelly counsel for Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund. Adding Kerry K. Fennelly as counsel of record for GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, et al. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, et al.. (Attorney Kerry Kessler Fennelly added to party Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Kerry Kessler Fennelly added to party GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund(pty:pla))(Fennelly, Kerry) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Valentina S Mindirgasova counsel for Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund. Jasleen D. Ahuja is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, et al.. (Mindirgasova, Valentina) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, upon Defendant Avsec Printing, Inc. served on 11/23/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Glen D. Davis, secretary, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Mindirgasova, Valentina) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Avsec Printing, Inc. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, identifying GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, et al.. (Mindirgasova, Valentina) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund. (Mindirgasova, Valentina) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund. (Mindirgasova, Valentina) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24696150 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund. (Attorney Valentina S Mindirgasova added to party Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Valentina S Mindirgasova added to party GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund(pty:pla))(Mindirgasova, Valentina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.