Magnacross LLC v. Netis Systems USA Corp.
Plaintiff: Magnacross LLC
Defendant: Netis Systems USA Corp.
Case Number: 2:2019cv09406
Filed: October 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (mrgo)
December 11, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:19-cv-09406 GW (AGRx). (esa)
December 11, 2019 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Magnacross LLC, upon Defendant Netis Systems USA Corp. served on 12/10/2019, answer due 12/31/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Anderson, Kirk)
December 10, 2019 Filing 11 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by plaintiff Magnacross LLC. (Anderson, Kirk)
December 5, 2019 Filing 10 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (sbou)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh: granting #8 Non-Resident Attorney David R. Bennett MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Magnacross LLC, designating Kirk Anderson as local counsel. (sbou)
November 8, 2019 Filing 8 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Non-Resident Attorney David R. Bennett to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Magnacross LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24758499) filed by plaintiff Magnacross LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Admission, #2 Proposed Order) (McArthur, M)
November 4, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Netis Systems USA Corp. (car)
November 4, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car)
October 31, 2019 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Magnacross LLC. (McArthur, M)
October 31, 2019 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Magnacross LLC. (McArthur, M)
October 31, 2019 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movant Magnacross LLC (McArthur, M)
October 31, 2019 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Magnacross LLC. (McArthur, M)
October 31, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24708851 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Magnacross LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney M Grant McArthur added to party Magnacross LLC(pty:bkmov))(McArthur, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Magnacross LLC v. Netis Systems USA Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Netis Systems USA Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Magnacross LLC
Represented By: M Grant McArthur
Represented By: David R Bennett
Represented By: Kirk J Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?