Christopher Pyle v. The City of Redondo Beach Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Pyle
Defendant: Redondo Beach City Of, John Anderson, Derek Theurer, The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Does 1 through 100, in their official capacities as Police Officers for the City of Redondo Beach, inclusive and Does 1 through 100, individually
Case Number: 2:2019cv09433
Filed: November 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER STRIKING Second Request to Reopen Case #47 . The Request is STRICKEN, for two reasons.First, the Request continues to contain filing errors. Without limitation, the caption page of the Request lists an incorrect date for the hearing. The Court expects error-free filings in this and all its cases and will continue to strike documents that contain errors. Second, and more importantly, the Request is premature. Plaintiff indicates that the Court of Appeal has not yet issued its mandate and that this Court will regain jurisdiction after the Court of Appeal's mandate has issued. Thus, Plaintiff is asking for an advance ruling thatthe Court will entertain a Rule 60(b) Motion once the Court of Appeal's mandate has issued. But until the mandate has issued, Plaintiffs Request asks for a ruling on a hypothetical situation that has not yet come to pass. The Court will not issue an advisory opinion of this sort. (lc)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 47 (STRICKEN PER 11/8/2022 MINUTES DOCKET NO. 48).Second REQUEST to Reopen Case to Entertain a Rule 60(b) Motion filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle. Request set for hearing on 1/23/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Miner, Shelby) Modified on 11/8/2022 (lc).
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: REQUEST to Reopen Case to Entertain a Rule 60(b) Motion #44 , for the following reasons: Based on the reasons in the discrepancy on docket no. 45. (lc)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 45 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Christopher Pyle's REQUEST to Reopen Case to Entertain a Rule 60(b) Motion #44 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. Request set Erroneously set on Judge's Motion calendar for 12/19/22 1:30 PM... a hearing which Does NOT appear on the filiing itself. As a Request MISSING proposed order which should have been submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 44 (STRICKEN PER 11/7/2022 ORDER DOCKET NO. 46). REQUEST to Reopen Case to Entertain a Rule 60(b) Motion filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle. Request set for hearing on 12/19/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Miner, Shelby) Modified on 11/7/2022 (lc).
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Order DENYING Request to Reopen Case AS MOOT #39 . On October 24, 2022, the Ninth Circuit issued a Memorandum affirming this Court's order and judgment dismissing Plaintiff's complaint for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Ninth Circuit also denied Plaintiff's request to remand the case to this court. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Request is DENIED AS MOOT, and the December 12, 2022 hearing is VACATED. (lc)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #33 filed by Christopher Pyle. CCA # 21-56318. The order and judgment of the district court are AFFIRMED. Pyle's motion to remand is DENIED. (lc)
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE ON REQUEST TO REOPEN CASE #39 ; ORDER to Lodge Proposed Order. The Court will treat Plaintiff's Request to Reopen Case as a formally noticed Motion.(Req., ECF No. 39.) Accordingly, the Court SETS a hearing on the Request, to be held on DECEMBER 12, 2022 at 1:30 PM (ECF No. 39.) Briefing deadlines for the Request/Motion shall be governed by the Local Rules. Moreover, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to lodge a Proposed Order in connection with his Request to Reopen Case, to be received by the Court no later than October 21, 2022. Failure todo so will result in the striking of the Request/Motion. (lc)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: REQUEST to Reopen Case to Entertain a Rule 60(b) Motion #39 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. Erroneously set on Judge's Motion calendar for 12/12/22 1:30 PM...hearing which does NOT appear on the filing. Clerk has TERMED ONLY this erroneous hearing. Request remains pending ruling. Missing Proposed order. Other error(s) with document(s): As an alternative, prepare and e-file a formal Notice of Lodging, to be docketed only under its specific event: Notice of Lodging, to which the formal proposed order is submitted as Separate Attachment thereto. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 REQUEST to Reopen Case to Entertain a Rule 60(b) Motion filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle. Request set for hearing on 12/12/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Miner, Shelby)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney H Mae G Alberto counsel for Defendants John Anderson, John Anderson, The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer, Derek Theurer. Mae G. Alberto is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Officer John Anderson and Officer Derek Theurer. (Attorney H Mae G Alberto added to party John Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney H Mae G Alberto added to party Derek Theurer(pty:dft))(Alberto, H)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #33 filed by Christopher Pyle. CCA # 21-56318. This case shall be submitted on the briefs and record, without oral argument, on October 18, 2022 in Pasadena, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (mat)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $ $3,238.00 in favor of City of Redondo Beach and against Christopher Pyle. #31
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 35 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 21-56318 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #34 , Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #33 as to plaintiff Christopher Pyle. (lc)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 34 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle. Appeal of Judgment, #29 , Order on Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution,, Order on Motion to Continue, #28 . (Appeal Fee - $505 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32434031.) (Miner, Shelby)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 33 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle. Appeal of Judgment, #29 , Order on Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution,, Order on Motion to Continue, #28 . (Appeal Fee - In forma pauperis status granted on 09/24/2019). (Attachments: #1 Supplement Approved Fee Waiver from Superior Court Pre-Removal of Case)(Miner, Shelby)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken counsel for Defendants John Anderson, John Anderson, The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer, Derek Theurer. Tori L.N. Bakken is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendants The City of Redondo Beach, a California Public Entity; John Anderson and Derek Theurer. (Bakken, Tori)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff, Christopher Pyle Christopher Pyle filed by Defendants John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), John Anderson(individually ), The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), Derek Theurer(individually ). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Smith, G)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney G Craig Smith counsel for Defendants John Anderson, John Anderson, The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer, Derek Theurer. Adding G. Craig Smith as counsel of record for Defendants, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, John Anderson, Derek Theurer for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, John Anderson, Derek Theurer. (Attorney G Craig Smith added to party John Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party John Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party The City of Redondo Beach Police Department(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party Derek Theurer(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party Derek Theurer(pty:dft))(Smith, G)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : Pursuant to the Court's Order Granting Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution #28 , it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION #25 AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION #27 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSES Plaintiffs action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant's ex parte application is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court will issue Judgment. (lc)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue MOTION FILING AND HEARING DEADLINES from December 6, 2021 to January 10, 2022 filed by defendants John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bakken, Tori)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) #25 filed by Defendant City of Redondo Beach and filed by Defendants John Anderson, Derek Theurer. (Bakken, Tori)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach). Motion set for hearing on 11/15/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tori Bakken, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Exhibit R, #20 Exhibit S, #21 Exhibit T, #22 Exhibit U, #23 Exhibit V, #24 Proposed Order) (Bakken, Tori)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney H Mae G Alberto counsel for Defendants John Anderson, The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer. Adding Mae G. Alberto as counsel of record for The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, a California Public Entity; John Anderson and Derek Theurer for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, a California Public Entity; John Anderson and Derek Theurer. (Attorney H Mae G Alberto added to party John Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney H Mae G Alberto added to party The City of Redondo Beach Police Department(pty:dft), Attorney H Mae G Alberto added to party Derek Theurer(pty:dft))(Alberto, H)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Having considered the parties' stipulation #22 and good cause appearing therefor, the Court ORDERS that the following dates and deadlines shall supersede any dates and deadlines previously set in the above-captioned action: Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/31/2022 01:30 AM ; before Judge Otis D. Wright II., Motion set for hearing on 2/14/2022 at 01:30 PM ; Jury Trial set for 3/1/2022 09:00 AM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 First STIPULATION to Modify Scheduling Order,, Terminate Hearings,, Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines, #12 filed by Defendants John Anderson(individually ), The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER)(Bakken, Tori)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael R Watts counsel for Defendants John Anderson, The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer. Michael R. Watts is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendants City Of Redondo Beach, Officer Anderson, and Officer Theurer. (Watts, Michael)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING #19 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Final Pretrial Conference : 10/4/2021 01:30 PM; Motion in Limine hearing: 10/25/2021 01:30 PM; Jury Trial: 11/2/2021 09:00 AM.(SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES) (lc)
December 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION for Order MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER filed by defendants John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bakken, Tori)
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #17 ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, JOHN ANDERSON, AND DEREK THEURER; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by defendants John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach).(Bakken, Tori)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),,, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle(Miner, Shelby)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ONTHE PLEADINGS #9 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: 1. The Motion is GRANTED with leave to amend as to Plaintiffs fourth cause of action of negligence against the City; 2. The Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs fourth cause of action ofnegligence against the remaining Defendants; and 3. The Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs second cause of action of civil rights violations under the Bane Act.Plaintiff chooses to amend his pleadings, he shall file a First AmendedComplaint in conformance with this Order no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. If Plaintiff files a FAC, Defendants shall file a response no later than 14 days from the date of the FAC filing. (lc)
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 The hearing on the MOTION FOR JUDGMENT #9 , scheduled for March 23, 2020 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings #9 filed by Defendants John Anderson, The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer. (Attorney Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken added to party John Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken added to party Derek Theurer(pty:dft))(Bakken, Tori)
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings #9 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle. (Miner, Shelby)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright II: THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED. SEE THE LAST PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE SPECIFIED DATES:Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/17/2021 01:30 PM., Jury Trial set for 6/15/2021 09:00 A., Amended Pleadings due by 5/25/2020., Discovery cut-off 2/15/2021., Motions in Limine to be filed by 5/17/2021., Proposed Pretrial Order due by 5/10/2021., Last date to conduct settlement conference is 3/22/2021. (lc)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for Settlement Conference. (lc)
February 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Exhibit A attached ; estimated length of trial 6 days, filed by Defendants John Anderson, The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer.. (O'Linn, Mildred)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendants John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer(individually ). Motion set for hearing on 3/23/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Julie Fleming with Exhibit "A", #2 Proposed Order, #3 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE) (Attorney Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken added to party John Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken added to party The City of Redondo Beach Police Department(pty:dft), Attorney Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken added to party Derek Theurer(pty:dft)) (Bakken, Tori)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f)] by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Scheduling Conference set for March 2, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. (lom)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central District's website for additional information. See minute order for details. (lom)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (ghap)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendants John Anderson, Redondo Beach City Of, Derek Theurer, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on 11/4/19. (Watts, Michael)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), John Anderson(individually ), Does(1 through 100, in their official capacities as Police Officers for the City of Redondo Beach, inclusive), Does(1 through 100, individually), The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), Derek Theurer(individually ). Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Christopher Pyle. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/24/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), John Anderson(individually ), The City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach), Derek Theurer(individually ). (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/31/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL)(ghap)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle, upon Defendant The City of Redondo Beach Police Department served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Officer Clark No 5225 as person authorized to accept- Age: 30's Race: White Sex: Female Height: 5'5' Weight: 165 Hair: Brown in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/22/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle, upon Defendant John Anderson(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach) served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019; John Anderson(individually ) served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Officer Clark No 5225 as person authorized to accept- Age: 30's Race: White Sex: Female Height: 5'5' Weight: 165 Hair: Brown in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/22/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christopher Pyle, upon Defendant Derek Theurer(in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City Redondo Beach) served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019; Derek Theurer(individually ) served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Officer Clark No 5225 as person authorized to accept- Age: 30's Race: White Sex: Female Height: 5'5' Weight: 165 Hair: Brown in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/22/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants John Anderson, Redondo Beach City Of, Derek Theurer, identifying Christopher Pyle, Plaintiff; The City Of Redondo Beach Police Department; John Anderson; Derek Theurer. (Attorney Michael R Watts added to party John Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney Michael R Watts added to party Redondo Beach City Of(pty:dft), Attorney Michael R Watts added to party Derek Theurer(pty:dft))(Watts, Michael)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants John Anderson, Redondo Beach City Of, Derek Theurer. (Watts, Michael)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV33786 Receipt No: 0973-24711707 - Fee: $400, filed by defendants Derek Theurer, John Anderson, Redondo Beach City Of. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Complaint, #3 Answer, #4 Redondo Beach Proof of Service, #5 Anderson Proof of Service, #6 Theurer Proof of Service) (Attorney Mildred K O'Linn added to party John Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney Mildred K O'Linn added to party Redondo Beach City Of(pty:dft), Attorney Mildred K O'Linn added to party Derek Theurer(pty:dft))(O'Linn, Mildred)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christopher Pyle v. The City of Redondo Beach Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Redondo Beach City Of
Represented By: Michael R Watts
Represented By: Mildred K O'Linn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Anderson
Represented By: Michael R Watts
Represented By: Mildred K O'Linn
Represented By: Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken
Represented By: G Craig Smith
Represented By: H Mae G Alberto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derek Theurer
Represented By: Michael R Watts
Represented By: Mildred K O'Linn
Represented By: Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken
Represented By: G Craig Smith
Represented By: H Mae G Alberto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Redondo Beach Police Department
Represented By: Michael R Watts
Represented By: Mildred K O'Linn
Represented By: Tori Lyn Noelani Bakken
Represented By: G Craig Smith
Represented By: H Mae G Alberto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, in their official capacities as Police Officers for the City of Redondo Beach, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, individually
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Pyle
Represented By: Kyle Todd
Represented By: Shelby Miner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?