Association for Corporate Growth, Inc. v. Webster et al
Association for Corporate Growth, Inc. |
William G. Webster, Jr. and Mary Lynn Webster |
2:2019cv09440 |
November 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Trademark |
28:1338 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Association for Corporate Growth, Inc.. (Birmingham, Jon) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Association for Corporate Growth, Inc.. (Birmingham, Jon) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Association for Corporate Growth, Inc.. (Birmingham, Jon) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Association for Corporate Growth, Inc., (Birmingham, Jon) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Association for Corporate Growth, Inc.. (Birmingham, Jon) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24713303 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Association for Corporate Growth, Inc.. (Attorney Jon A Birmingham added to party Association for Corporate Growth, Inc.(pty:pla))(Birmingham, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.