Rashid El Malik v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
| Rashid El Malik |
| DOES 1-5 and Department of Veteran Affairs |
| 2:2019cv09471 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Gail J Standish |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Denying #9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. (bm)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION BY PLAINTIFF TO ADD DEFENDANTS re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND #14 filed by Plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. Motion set for hearing on 2/24/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (bm) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting #10 EX PARTE APPLICATION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint is extended up to and including March 3, 2020. (bm)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service by Mailing #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Subsequent Document Filings-Proof of Service (subsequent documents). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 11 Proof of Service by Mailing filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 3/3/2020 re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 #10 (Chen, Margaret) |
| Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 3/3/2020 re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Margaret M. Chen, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Margaret Ming Chen added to party Department of Veteran Affairs(pty:dft)) (Chen, Margaret) |
| Filing 9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) |
| Filing 8 PLAINTIFF RASHID EL MALIK REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OR THINGS filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Motion [Docket 6] by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 6 SEALED - MOTION TO PROCEED TO FILE APPLICATION WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COURT COST filed by plaintiff Rashid El Malik. (bm) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 4 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Rashid El Malik against Defendant Department of Veteran Affairs. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Filing fee $ 400) Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
